Legal Precedent

Tel Aviv 4344/02 Y.L. v. Dr. Catherine Bro et al.

29 December 2016
Tel Aviv 4344/02 Y.L. v. Dr. Catherine Bro et al.

The plaintiff reported to her doctors several times that she was suffering from severe headaches. The treating physicians at the health fund initially diagnosed acute pharyngitis and subsequently acute sinusitis.

Only two days later, the plaintiff was rushed to the hospital after fainting, where it was diagnosed that she was suffering from bleeding into the brain cavity due to a cerebral aneurysm.

Ms. L., who was left with a very severe neurological disability at a rate of 100%, filed a lawsuit through our office to the District Court, where it was determined that the recording of her complaints in the health fund's medical file was deficient and did not reveal, as required, the nature of the complaints conveyed to the treating doctor.

The court therefore examined the deficient medical records with suspicion and accordingly determined that Ms. L. indeed complained of headaches during all four visits to the health fund and that despite the existence of signs that should have raised a "red flag," no urgent neurological examination was performed, which would have been required under the circumstances.

The court therefore found that the treating physicians were negligent in their duties and failed to diagnose the cerebral aneurysm in time.

The court ordered the health fund to compensate Ms. Y.L. for all of her severe damages in the amount of approximately 3.5 million ₪!

The health fund's appeal to the Supreme Court was also rejected, with emphasis that as part of their duties, the family doctor must pay special attention to the existence of recurring symptoms within a few days, especially when dealing with a patient who did not frequently visit the health fund.

To the verdict

Related Precedents You May Find Interesting

T.A. 8155/06 A.Z. v. Meuhedet Health Fund

T.A. 8155/06 A.Z. v. Meuhedet Health Fund

Mrs. T.A., of blessed memory, complained during her pregnancy to her treating doctor that she believed there was a lump in her left breast. The doctor dismissed her with the explanation that it was a milk lump resulting from the pregnancy and did not refer her to have the matter examined as required. After childbirth, Mrs. A. continued to complain about the lump, but even then the treating doctors refrained from conducting a professional investigation and treated her [...][Read more](/ת-א-815506-א-צ-נ-קופת-חולים-מאוחדת)

Read More
T.A. 48994/05 (Magistrate Court – Herzliya) R.C. v. Hachsharat Hayishuv

T.A. 48994/05 (Magistrate Court – Herzliya) R.C. v. Hachsharat Hayishuv

Our law office handled a lawsuit involving a car accident in which a young woman was injured at the age of 23 in 2004. As a result of the accident, she was left with medical disabilities at a rate of 45%, both in the orthopedic and psychiatric fields. The court describes in its verdict that it was very impressed by the plaintiff's personality, credibility, and great honesty. The court was impressed by the character of [...][Read more](/ת-א-4899405-שלום-הרצליה-ר-ח-נ-הכשרת-הישוב)

Read More
S.P. (Minor) v. Clalit Health Fund (Civil Case 3132/01 Jerusalem District Court)

S.P. (Minor) v. Clalit Health Fund (Civil Case 3132/01 Jerusalem District Court)

Mrs. P. became pregnant unexpectedly at age 40 and sought to terminate the pregnancy through abortion, but at the last moment was convinced to continue with the pregnancy, after reaching an agreement with her gynecologist that the pregnancy would receive close supervision and monitoring, and that in any case where there was concern for the fetus's wellbeing, the doctors would terminate the pregnancy. In practice, the promises proved to be false and the treatment and monitoring provided for this pregnancy were inadequate and negligent. [...][Read more](/ש-פ-קטין-נגד-קופח-כללית-ת-א-313201-מחוזי-ירוש)

Read More